So I’ve been inspired to do a few new things. Let’s see what you think. Consider this an unofficial sidebar to my unofficial conversion of the prinny for 5th edition.
The concept of a prinny is fascinating when it comes to the way it is integrated into the celestial hierarchies of Dungeons and Dragons. There are many creatures that could be considered analogues to the prinny, such as fiendish larva, lemures, and manes. However, none as as compelling as the knife wielding murder penguins.
Prinny have occupied an interesting place in the greater Disgaea universe, and I think they could fit very well. They are souls, trapped in a kind of indentured limbo, and forced to work until the universe decides they’ve paid their penance. Why not include these odd creatures as enemies, allies, or even paid conscripts in the planar landscape? You could do worse, DOOD!
So I was “baited”* into creating a monster stat block. Read into it what you will. Or nothing at all.
For what its worth, I’ve had a long and storied history with being kind to internet trolls. It often disarms them. I’ll point you to a famous incident that shows that most of these people are hurt, and there are not often enough hugs or good intentions in the world to undo what other lousy human beings have wrought.
That said, not everyone is a healer, so there is that, too. You never owe anything to anyone who has the intention to hurt you, ever. They can often do lasting harm if you do not have the armor necessary to help.
All that seriousness to introduce this ridiculous thing I wrote that pokes fun at a darker aspect of our media driven culture. Don’t judge me! Or do, I guess.
This page isn’t dead! You could liken it to a phoenix, or perhaps a pop-culture movie franchise*.
Today I would like to review the “Limitless Adventures: Non-Player Characters vol.1” product, which provides a vast wealth of NPC resources.
First off, the book is massive. I’m looking to print it out to have it available, and at 131 pages, it is going to be a decently sized resource that I’ll have to fit into a 3 ring binder**. Despite the lack of art (which I personally do not mind), this book does for NPC stat blocks what Tome of Beasts does for monster stat blocks.
The book is separated into five categories: allies, contacts, foes, merchants, and archenemies. Each category upwards of 20 entries, with the exception of archenemies which has five.
The ally section seems to skew towards lower CR creatures that serve as assistance and plot foils more than combatants, which is just fine. Though their statistics are not as important, knowing that an ally might have a skill or connection, or even a healing ability might be extra useful to a party out of combat. Great care is given to both giving these allies a lot of personality, as well as providing plenty of plot hooks to make each NPC both useful for advancing a plot, or for weaving a story!
While the archenemy section has fewer entries, each archenemy is given multiple stat blocks to map out the parallel growth they may have to your group during a campaign. This is an excellent move, and one that will make using these stat blocks easy and intuitive, cutting down significantly on prep time!
While the contacts section is ostensibly useful, though it mignt have been better to merely list an NPC, their personality, and the kind of information they can provide, as a contact is unlikely to be used in combat. On the other hand, I could also imagine people complaining for a lack of a stat block, and I this guide is nothing if not thorough. To that end, these contacts could serve double duty, and an enterprising GM could very well use the stat blocks for NPCs that are not contacts.
The foes section is really interesting, and provides a plethora of interesting combatants that could allow you to include all manner of enemies for your players, and can even be used to construct an enemy adventuring party! As a persistent theme for each NPC, the foes are given plenty of flavor and ample adventure seeds to make them relevant or even central to a session or even campaign! Entire stories could be weaved around foes of varying power. I am personally excited to include some of these ideas in my next game. The only complaint I have is that list seems to be a bit orc-heavy.
The merchant section is one that I am particularly impressed with, as it not only gives merchants that sell goods, but services as well. In both cases, the NPCs are given plenty of character and flare, as even the entries for their goods and services are given a bit of spice to differentiate and distinguish each NPC. The authors did a great job at this, and created merchants that are distinct enough to include in any campaign!
There are a few hiccups, such as referring to skills without their ability scores [i.e. Medicine rather than Wisdom (Medicine)], but this doesn’t bother me much. It depends on how much of a stickler you are for formatting.
All that being said, I am very happy with this book, and the few flaws I found are easily overlooked. This book is well worth the price, and can provide not only a reprieve from session planning, but even as an abundant source of inspiration for adventure!
While I had taken a hiatus that lasted roughly one year off of gaming in general, I had a lot to consider. My life had changed, I had a new job, and I had a new group of friends. Ultimately, so much was fundamentally different about my life that gaming simply took a back seat.
And it wasn’t that I didn’t still like it or want to prioritize it, but I had always imagined that life would take precedent over anything gaming related; that I would stop being so obsessed with role playing if my life ever careened away from the bachelor path. That simple fact seemed to keep me sane through the wild abandon that I had shown in my youth.
Ultimately, I had slowed down, and taken stock of my life. I had no uncontrolled urge to pad my ego or revisit the spring of my youth; rather, it was a time for reflection and re-calibration. I was a new person, sloughing off many of my old ways like so much dead skin. While role playing was marginalized in this yearlong period, I had ultimately yearned to return to it.
While this had ultimately manifested in a fungus like growth that urged me to continue writing. Part of this apotheosis was manifested by my heavy reading of Pathfinder books due to my mistaken hope that the elven royalty campaign in which I had been playing might resume. My research of the Pathfinder setting had me fall in love with the way that Paizo produces material, and gave me inspiration to do the same.
At the same time, I had still been stinging from being done with Exalted, and sought to create a system that facilitated the telling of a story. That ongoing attempt is a pet project of mine that falls squarely into the indie gaming zone, and though I didn’t know it at the time, I had a lot to learn about the methodology behind such an undertaking.
What I had done was to start listening to podcasts.
I have been happy to find a number of podcasts that continue to give me an insight into the industry. RPG Design Panel Cast is a very impressive podcast for those of you that are interested, but others such as Gamers Tavern or The Tome Show are great for presenting the voice of the industry in a relatively personal and digestible level.
The interesting element to all of this is that I had, until that point, been insulated from games that didn’t come to me from friends or that I liked on sight. These podcasts started to introduce me to such games as Fiasco, Savage Worlds, Apocalypse World et al., and Dogs in the Vineyard.
I had always cast a critical eye to the very foundation of a game’s design. Why do orcs drop gold? Why should a failed skill check ruin the fun? What does epic even mean? But what I had now was a much needed dose of wisdom that came from people who were experts at what I was merely grasping. I had a framework that compelled me to stand on the shoulders of those giants to reach for something greater than myself.
These instructional podcasts helped me adjust my thinking, especially as I enter a new phase in my life. I find myself introducing my children to role playing with some care and attention, thanks to what I’ve learned. I design games not as an acerbic bachelor that growls on message boards, but as a father and an educator that wants to see what games can do for the mind.
At the same time, I find myself finally receiving an education in game writing that isn’t insular. Best of all, they are being published legitimately. I am lucky to have a bevy of people and a community that is supportive that may actually help me see my hopes to fruition, but I will talk more about that in the weeks to come.
What had drawn me to Pathfinder was my wish to start a new game with my favorite GM, whom decided to give the relatively new Pathfinder system a try. In our game, the Obsidian Portal entry of which I may link to later, we all played as the children of elven royalty. I was initially hoping that we would get to play a World of Darkness game, but I was willing to try, as I had not stretched my wizard muscle in quite a while.
I retook to wizardry quickly, creating a character that, while not optimized per se*, was prominent in both personality and potence. My Elven Wizard, Lorathorn, had saved the group from a few tight spots, and at times with only his wits and planning. He would go on to be king of an elven nation (thus the name of the blog), and make hard decisions that rankled his many siblings. I loved this game, and it resparked my hitherto latent interest in a system that I had largely turned my back on for its “lack of storytelling potential” ** Ultimately, what I had come to crave were these complexities that I had long spurned. The difference now was that there was a system that was more adequately geared to accommodate such complexities without the pretense of being “realistic” or what have you***.
Now, I had heard virtually nothing of Pathfinder outside of my tangential brush with Paizo through Dragon Magazine, thanks to a miniature promotion that appealed to my interest in collectible figurines. Through that portal, I knew that Dragon and Dungeon were soon ending, and that the company would roll out a new magazine. I would refer you specifically to their blog entries beginning here.
While I had my fill of D&D some time in 09, thanks to a somewhat turbulent and unwelcoming campaign, I had been away long enough to yearn for the complications and puzzle-like mechanisms that could link to form potent rule combinations. Pathfinder, as it happened, was even more fiddly in terms of complex interlocking rules, but with a somewhat more unified approach than Dungeons and Dragons 3rd edition (et al.) had been able to offer. This unity is what line developers do, and in Pathfinder it was done well.
I like how intricate Pathfinder system is. I can’t say that the experience is for everyone, given how popular 4th edition D&D ultimately was (feel free to challenge me on this), but Paizo and it’s Pathfinder game occupy a space in the role playing panoply that caters to this need for intricacy.
I say this because here I find myself, waist deep into my renewed interest in writing in a (somewhat) more professional capacity, and coming to terms with my strengths and weaknesses. I love the crunch and interlocking methodology of D20 and it’s component offshoots, but my passion has (and ever shall be) with prose writing, as I prove here. Wherever my strengths may lie, I would have to use the mirror of community, both for self reflection and to understand an audience with whom I had not yet been acquainted.
It bears mentioning that Pathfinder has been very kind to me. The only thing stopping me from involvement with the community at large was my frictious time spent delving into the other groups, which had left me trepidatious to the prospect of trying again. From the time I started playing as Lorathorn in 2010, it took me nearly 5 years to finally get the nerve to initiate contact, which I did by entering the 2015 RPG Superstar contest at Paizo.
And while my entry was not stellar****, it did help me take a step in the right direction. I have since initiated contact with a number of great people that have dispensed invaluable advice and wisdom regarding topics from proper formatting of statistical blocks to the philosophy on rules balancing. While all of this contains my experiences with Pathfinder, I have also been listening to a steady stream of podcasts that have filled my head with ideas from independent role playing games, a subject about which I will discuss next week.
* I rather dislike optimization as a rule. I don’t mind maximizing your potential as one would, but following rote templates takes the fun of discovery and adventure from developing a character. It’d be like playing a game of Magic: the Gathering with a deck made by someone else, thus robbing you of the pride of architecture. [Achievement unlocked: paragraph footnote]
** Powerful storytelling can be done with any role playing system, but a system can tend to pick a GM, as it were.
*** See part 2.
**** I seem to do poorly at contests, it seems
So, now I had learned about Exalted. It was a slow boiling love that would one day culminate into a pitched fever, though it started out lukewarm. My favorite GM introduced out group to it, and we were all reluctant. Our first game might have lasted about 3 sessions, not including the tedious first time character creation. We were all new to it, and we hadn’t jelled to the thematic just yet, but all the same, it took us that first bit of stumbling to see what the game could be, and to shake off the dust of standard fantasy gaming and realize the potential of a gonzo mythical setting.
Much as with all things, I threw myself into Exalted headlong once I saw that it was more than just a repainted fantasy setting. It was a dynamic, exciting and organic world that was still growing out of the heads of people who had inherited it from the original authors. Those initial authors had at first seen it as a prequel of sorts to the World of Darkness at large, and thought to treat it as a Hyborian Age style survival conflict epic; a more bare and honest treatment of their current lines. Similar to Systems Failure*, the premise was changed for the better, and the result was phenomenal.
What could not be predicted was the way in which Exalted evolved from a primitive survival drama into a fantastic animistic epic of mythic proportions. And neither could they have controlled the colossal scope that sprung from a fertile concept that begged to grow into absurd proportions. Every encouragement was there to simply cause the setting to burst into a myriad of wonderful directions. This did not always happen**, but Exalted did its best to self-correct towards its disastrously gonzo path.
This having been said, I was at the margins of the community for quite a while. I had done some time at the first iteration of the Exalted Compendium, which did a good job of attracting some of the more corrosive personalities attached to Exalted at large. There were also side projects and contests in which I participated, but a lump sum of my involvement saw fruit in the official White Wolf forums. From here I made friends and enemies through the naturally socio-anthropological discussions that were (and likely still are) inseparable from the zeitgeist of the Exalted community.
That having been said, I was a fairly polarizing individual within the community, as I had been in the Palladium Books forums as well. However, while I held a position of infamy within the Palladium forums, the actual creative minds behind the books were less involved with the fan base. Through the development of Exalted into its current iteration, the fan base and the creative teams were so intertwined as to be indistinguishable.
And perhaps I am wrong, but I will state my opinion without hesitation; I believe that the creative team behind Exalted suffered for being so close to its fan base. I was too close to see it then, but I can look back clearly to several events that intensified the metamorphosis of Exalted. The game switched subtly from being a very vibrant setting about greatness and tragedy, to being an abstracted thought exercise about trans-humanist philosophy and moral relativism.
Where once you could expect to play an analogue of Alexander the Great or Hercules, the expectation shifted into a navel gazing exercise that favored ambiguity over excitement. This is not at all a bad space to explore in role-playing games, but the fundamental alteration had forced the game to surrender its identity.
Worse still, there was a surging and eminently vocal portion of the fan-base that espoused the need for the rules to be “realistic”, a term that I maintain was not understood at all by this subset. I’ll humor the concept for sake of fairness.
In brief: if there was a way to win the game through a combination of abilities and powers, it was unrealistic for anyone NOT to immediately secure these combinations, even if that skewed the balance of the game towards a resource-grubbing tedium.
It was perhaps one of the most baffling instances of meta-gaming I had ever seen, at once favoring the realism over meta-game, but also wielding the meta-game unfairly against the game itself.
This poisonous perspective wrought much havoc throughout the community. On the one hand, some aspects of the realism stance were valid. For instance, characters could accrue so much experience that optimization was inevitable. Higher level play tended towards insurmountable defenses that could last until one side was exhausted of energy points. This was not ok, but it represented only a segment of play. What this “faction” accomplished was to take the problems on the back-end, and convinced people to apply them universally.
In short, a game that was at least functional 70% of the time now became non-functioning 100% of the time. There was a great call for the game to be fixed, but each successive fix was informed by the same group that cleaved to some twisted sense of realism in a game about glowing godlings. For that reason, the fixes were flawed in the extreme, as the collective community fragmented further.
The game’s philosophy and underlying mechanics were so warped that it undermined the very experience of playing the game. The change came late for the poor majority that was not plugged in to the strange commune-like atmosphere that decided what was best for those who didn’t speak or know to be informed, in an almost eerie Orwellian way. And while I might have been initially fooled by some of these changes, I soon began to do what I could to counter the worst of the assertions, only to be challenged or ignored by the actual staff in charge of the game line. I quickly realized that the fight was neither winnable, nor legitimately mine. The game that I loved was lost in a procession of egos.
I could still play MY Exalted, even if it was considered “wrong” (a concept that rankles me to this day). No one could take from me the vision of the game to which I held. Conversely, the true tragedy was that organic nature that initially propelled Exalted was now its undoing. Some could blame the merger between White Wolf and CCP, but the writing on the wall was evident that Exalted was being upended by its fanbase.
Even though I had written for Exalted in an extremely limited capacity***, nothing came of it. As a freelance writer, this would be a time of dearth and unrealized potential. Though I painfully learned many valuable lessons, my writing was stunted. I had written campaign notes, but I wrote very little that I could consider professional or polished. Crushed as I was by my prior freelancing experience, Exalted was at once the balm and bane to my creativity.
I’m aware that there is a new edition. I’m not interested in the slightest. The new architects are the very people who had, in some way or another, sent Exalted careening into a direction from which it can hardly be recovered.
Though the game had really consumed nearly 8 years of my attention, it was not the only game that I read or played. In the between times, I played an ample amount of Rifts, Heavy Gear (Dream Pod 9), Dungeons and Dragons, and even Pathfinder. And from the otherwise badly apportioned time taken by Exalted, a number of events would change my perspective for the better.
I was starting to fall in love with Pathfinder, and more importantly, I met and married the love of my life. Both of these events would spur my muse to consider two important decisions. First, I needed to write, and be published, even if it was primarily to sharpen my skill. In the next post, I will discuss the details of these endeavors.
* See part 1
** see Exalted: the Lunars, first edition
*** I never got credited, and I probably can’t give details as such, but I did.
One of the most neglected issues within the process of starting a campaign, it seems, is the formation of the group. While some groups appear to have a penchant for creating each character in a relative vacuum, this can very easily lead to problems down the line.
As I mentioned in Across the Screen #0, having a “session 0” is very important, and that session can and should include character creation for everyone. In terms of a D&D type game (settings and systems may vary), there is very little reason to be duplicitous about your character and their abilities.
I have seen numerous characters seek to hide aspects of their characters. This occurs with varying alignments, but tending towards the rogue class. Players often do this to “steal from others” with impunity, or at least with less scrutiny than if they were known to be sneaky types. This kind of approach is difficult at best, as it forces all players to maintain an anonymity about their characters and capabilities.
Here is the brass tacks: You are playing a game that hinges on creativity, cooperation, and more than a little luck to carry you through dangerous encounters. You don’t need to kneecap you or your party by trying to be greedy about loot distribution, nor should you impose an unnecessary inter-party conflict because you want to be able to dupe the other characters, and, by extension, other players.
And listen, there is a time and a place for that. Play Fiasco. Play Wraith: the Oblivion. Play a board game. Or be on board with everyone and play a fantastic campaign that relies on storytelling more than rules. Better yet, play some hack and slash computer game that will probably satisfy your need to loot and plunder. But don’t set out to cheat people in D&D. There is absolutely no reason to do that in the default game of D&D.
But I digress. There are other reasons to build your characters together, though. There is more synergy and enjoyment when you can riff off of and work alongside your fellow players, as well as the GM to create a group that isn’t just a bundle of strangers that are at a tavern at the same time. I can guarantee you that you will have a better time, work more cohesively, and better understand what your group can collectively do.
I defy anyone who approaches the game from a “I am going to hide a trick up my sleeve by creating my character in secret” to give me one good reason that it benefits anyone within the scope of the game, including yourself. Ask yourself, what do you gain by trying to keep a trick to use against your fellow adventurers, or sillier yet, the effective god of the shared reality. Really think about what you stand to gain by doing that, and consider the benefits of sharing and growing together, as the game tends to encourage.
Maybe this isn’t an issue for you, but ask yourself how cohesive your group is before coming to any conclusions.